Difference of a circumcissed or uncircumcissed penis? -

Hello, i was wondering if there where any differences between a penis that was circumccised and one that was not. I was not circumcissed at birth and i was wondering if there was really any differences. Most boys at my school seem to have had it done when they were born. Im just curious to know if any one if really quot;betterquot; than the other.

Physically the difference between an uncircumcised and a circumcised penis is the presence or absence of the foreskin - a sleeve of skin which normally covers the glans (head) at birth. For drawings of circumcised and uncircumcised penises see http://www.circinfo.net/what_is_circumci... Circumcision is one of the world s oldest and most common operations, being performed for at least 25% of all men in many different parts of the world. In the USA about 85% of man have been circumcised. It is compulsory for Jews, Moslems and members of many African tribes. Circumcision confers many life-long medical benefits by removing the foreskin which can act as a breeding ground for fungal and bacterial infections. It is also proven to be the vector by which HIV/AIDS enters the body during heterosexual encounter with an infected female. Circumcised men do not suffer from phimosis, paraphimosis, balanoposthitis or frenulum breve. Sex is improved by a slight increase of staying power as well as because the sensitive rim of the glans is then able to directly stimulate (and be stimulated by) the walls of the vagina without the foreskin acting as a barrier.

You are SO LUCKY to not be circumcised. Most males in the US are circumcised (I hope I spelt it wright). Anyway circumcision removes the foreskin on the penis. So if you are not circumcised you have your foreskin, that s great! If you have foreskin, you get more pleasure from sex and masturbating. Never get yourself circumcised. Enjoy your foreskin.

you want to know the difference? Circumcision is the removal of the foreskin. A circumcised Penis have no or less foreskin. Some men have a naturally short foreskin, that covers only the half or less of the glans. a I am circumcised with 25 years and glad about it.

The foreskin acts to funnel decease to the immune system.this is both good and bad.uncircumsized are slightly less at risk for most STD s but more at risk of HIV since that actually attacks the immune system. Also circumsized is just easier to keep clean.

According to the American Pediatric Association there are no medical benefits whatsoever to systematic circumcision dear. Of course it s just the opinion of a bunch of MDs and PhDs who spent years in the best institutions of fine learning and hospitals of the nation...

Well there is in fact no difference at all besides that little piece of skin they cut off. And both need to be cleaned properly. Greetings:Chaos

Both sides will say that theirs is better, but really there is no difference

The circumcised is clean!! and the uncircumcised one is more likely to get STDs

not better but i was told by a boyfriend a little more sensitive

one has a foreskin and one doesn t