1. That s one part of your body where you want as much quot;meatquot; as possible... ;) 2. We evolved that way for a reason. 3. Cleaning and hygiene quot;down therequot; should be done regardless. 4. The cells of the inside layer of your foreskin can actually help control or prevent minor infections in many cases. Conversely this makes them mose susceptible to picking up HIV for that very reason. 5. Wear condoms.
No you don t. You can t get a foreskin problem, but that applies if you remove any body part - take out you teeth and you won t have cavities. Foreskin problems are rare and easily treatable. Other than that it s about the same. Some studies have shown circumcised guys acquire STDs less easily, but other studies have shown no difference or circumcised guys acquiring STDs more easily, and so in practical terms you need to wear a condom either way. It s not healthier to be circumcised. Harriet
if ur dick isn t circumcised u have a better chance of getting infections. it s a fact, please look it up. anyone who says differently really is wrong.
no, both cut and uncut guys should was their penis and wear a condom in order to prevent infections the whole myth that says quot;it s hygienic to cut the skin offquot; has been debunked, don t believe any of that biased and incorrect quot;infoquot;
just wash and you are fine
It doesn t matter if your uncircumcised or not, you can get the same disease either way. Disease don t care what your penis looks like.
A few decades ago, doctors advocated douching for women, to wash out the inner recesses of the vagina. It was popular for a time but then people realized that disrupting the natural flora in there actually makes infections more likely. Nature s own system is very good at keeping everything working properly. Similarly, the foreskin works to protect the penis and keep it clean. Smegma (produced by males and females) keeps the parts soft and fights off infection. Getting rid of it is only necessary if you re expecting oral sex. Otherwise, simply rinsing in the shower is all that s needed to flush away the dead skin cells and let the penis continue maintaining itself. The rate of complications from circumcision is comparable to the rate of problems with a natural penis. But surgical complications tend to be serious, while foreskin problems are almost always very minor. So it s healthier to be natural.
There is no reason to have a circumcised penis unless there is a health issue in a developed county like the US.
Being uncircumcised is normal and natural. Circumcision is unnatural and abnormal. Having a foreskin doesn t make a man more susceptible to disease, that is a bunch of old wive s tales and lies put forth by the medical profession to try to get more males mutilated by circumcision. Doctors make money from circumcision, and also are very frequently members of the religions that try to mutilate all males with circumcision. HIV isn t prevented by circumcision, that s another lie. In the US, at the height of the epidemic, about 80% of men were cicrumcised, yet the US had a much higher rate of infection than the countries that didn t mutilate males with circumcision. If anything, this would indicate that circumcised males are more at risk for HIV. Circumcision is the worst hoax ever perpetrated on the male sex. A foreskin is not a birth defect; it is a birthright. ERIC
Unless you are a really dirty person who doesn t shower regularly and let stuff build up under the foreskin, it really doesn t make that much difference. It just looks nicer and is a Jewish tradition.... Uncircumsized sex apparantly feels better, but how would you know? Usually ppl are done when a baby, so you can t miss what you don t know!
NO ! that s just bulsh1t as long as u clean ur penis daily it will remain clean. u got it in the 1st place for a reason
i don t know because i was born with no foreskin over my penis yes people it can happen cause the skin sometimes will not develop over the penis and i have done research that the uncircumcised and circumcised are both natural a lot of people are not born with the foreskin and a lot of people are plus circumcise can be traced back to 18,000 years ago the foreskin is just a bunch of leftover skin it really is not that big of a deal if you have it or not and i am highly against the restore foreskin idea just a waste of money and medical research there are worst medical problems out there and losing a small piece of skin is not a big deal having no foreskin does not make you less of a man complaining about it does.
If you bathe regularly, then there is absolutely NO difference. There is not enough medical evidence to support the theory that circumcised is quot;healthierquot;. Heck, 70% of the world s males still have their foreskins. If it were THAT unhealthy, the world would be in BIG trouble! If a guy were FILTHY and bathes like ONCE a MONTH, then there would be a higher likelihood of getting infections under the foreskin. It would smell worse than a circumcised penis too. Otherwise, there is no reason to circumcise.
If you clean properly you should have no problem with either.
All you really need do is look at the empirical evidence... If foreskins were unhealthy, natural selection would have weeded them out. Hundreds of thousands of years of human evolution and we still have foreskins... there is a reason for that.
actually you do enjoy sex more.. when you are snipped :0).. as there is a area jus below the head where feel quite good.. when you aren t circumcisd you wont enjoy it as much.. cant remember where.. but look it up oprah.. i know.. sound lame.. but hey why be ashamed when you want to know abt your own body... oh and it a bit safer than when not snipped (nothin is safe)
No, it is better and healthier to be intact or not circumcised. The foreskin and glans together produce anti microbial compounds that fight off disease. Cutting this skin off means there is not more disease protection. The circumcision scam is just that. It is based on myths and untruths. If it is so much healthier, why is the US, which is one of the main circumcising cultures in the world hosting the highest rate of AIDs of any first world country? The stories and the reality just do not add up. Europe, which is not a circumcising culture has one of the lowest rates for STDs and AIDs. Even Islamic cultures have AIDs. You are better and further ahead to remain intact, and to leave your sons intact. Connor and EW have already provided some good answers.
As long as you have good hygiene (i.e. wash under your foreskin each day) you are no more at risk.
No you don t. As long as you ise a thing called soap and water, you don t. Studies have shown that circumcised men are no less at risk for getting anything over an uncircumcised man as well as they practice good hygiene. There are myths out there that say it s healthier, or cleaner, or you are less likley to get infections or STD s. Those aren t true. Infact all of the studies that have ever been able to show any correlation between STD s and circumcision were done in Africa. And they were only correlations, they never proved that uncircumcised men were less likley to get infections, they just concluded it quot;mightquot; be the case. But no study preformed in America or any other country for that matter has been able to prove anything. America has a very high STD rate as well as a very high circumcision rate. So therfore circumcision can t prevent people from getting STD s. Or lower their chances of getting one. Also there have been myths out there that circumcision greatly reduces your chances of getting penile cancer, that s false. Denmark (in fact is trying to make a law stating that it s illegal to circumcise and infant.) has the lowest penils cancer rate in the world and one of the lowest circumcision rates. So that myth can t be true either. Men in Europe, who usually only bathe once or twice a week, don t get as many infections as men here in the US. So that proves circumcision doesn t reduce your chances of getting an infection either. People today still buy into the myths that say it s so much healthier. If it really hurt us as much as people say it does, then we wouldn t be born with it. -Connor
quot;...the conclusion is always there ready-made before the thinking process; the thinking does not serve, as in the rational realm, to arrive at a correct conclusion; rather, it serves to confirm an already existing irrational conclusion and to rationalize it. This is generally called quot;prejudicequot;; what is overlooked is that this prejudice has social consequences of considerable magnitude, that it is very wide-spread and practically synonymous with what is called inertia and tradition ; it is intolerant, that is, it does not tolerate the rational thinking which might do away with it; consequently, the thinking of the emotional plague is inaccessible to arguments; it has its own technique within its own realm, its own logicality , as it were; for this reason, it gives the impression of rationality without being actually rational.quot;
Yes
Yes, it is safer to be circumsised. The foreskin can get dirt and other materials trapped in it and it can get infected.
That s a good question ! I am going to see my doctor only to ask if is any risk for a dult to get circuncise Because I want to do it , Iam tired of pull back my foreskin even to use a condom ... I think is good for higiene porpuses .
Circumcised helps to keep it cleaner. Though I would think uncircumcised helps keep away infections, since it s covered. Though it really doesnt.
0 comments:
Post a Comment