In the USA there is a cultural bias against an intact penis, because people are used to circumcised penises. But most girls, unless they are really shallow, would not have a problem on an intact penis unless they liked the guy. I would prefer to have an intact partner (and luckily I do), the foreskin is normal, looks normal and is fun to play with. But I m from Australia not the USA. I bet most of those girls didn t know that until two or three generations, men in the USA weren t circumcised either, and that only 50% of babies are circumcised now in the US (all other developed nations having abandoned the practice) Harriet
No, they don t mid and to the person a few comments above me that started dribbling on about sum crappy survey in kenya, Um hello were not in Kenya keep it clean and keep it, forget about it and let it get dirty then forget your foreskin. There has been much speculation about weather having an uncircumcised cock causes gives you an increased risk of aids, Fact is there is no evidence to back it up. If nature wanted men to have half complete penises we would have been born that way, not because some idiot decades ago thought it was a good idea to start hacking away at penis s it may have seemed like a good idea at the time but its been proved time and time again that there is no difference in the contraction of aids, However there is a difference from first hand experience circumcised men have alot less sensitivity during sex. So to the person a few comments up you go rite ahead and hack away at your sons cock but when he grows up and says mom why does my penis look different and why are there bits missing you can turn around and say oh mom decided to to chop some of you off, no go play in your room.
No especially in europe the circumcised penis is looked on as odd and deformed Ps Do your home work properly n.mcc22 the surveys you have quoted have been ripped apart many time as grossly inaccurate circumcision leaves the penis more susceptible to infection not less If you take the age group which is most sexually active ie 16-30 which at this moment in America means approx 85% circumcised and set that side by side with England approx 95% uncircumcised. After multiplying the number of people in England to equal that of America and then multiply the rate of infectious disease by the same number (England only) so it makes everything level. You get some very interesting results . Make note this bit is important English girls start their sex life on average 2 years before American girls and have 2.3 times the number of partners and are 4 times less likely to use condoms which puts them about 8 times more at risk HIV nearly double in America Syphilis approx 3 times in America N.S.U 4 times in America and wait for it because this is the best one Chlamydia 6 yes 6 times the rate of infection in America Rather blows your argument that circumcision is cleaner and less prone to infection clear out of the water. Oh yes by the way you need to type into your browser ( heart attack circumcision ) if you look you will find work done by a university study in Scotland because of the slight amount of extra pressure circumcision put on a babies heart over a lifetime it results in circumcised men having their first heart attack 5 year earlier, bet you doctors didn’t tell you that did they. May I strongly suggest that you people which are spouting this rubbish do your homework first instead of listening to lies myths and fairy stories and then just repeating them. No actually I am not a circumcision hater I quiet enjoyed sex with two of my three circumcised partners ( all rest uncut) and Yes I am very fond of American people you are mostly warm, friendly, kind and very mannerly. What I don’t like is to see people like you being mislead by the very people you should be able to trust the most, your medical profession.
I personally prefer circumcised. I ve been with both circumcised/uncircumcised, and from my experience the uncircumcised weren t as quot;cleanquot; as the circumcised. I don t catagorize all men to be clean/unclean; this is just my experience. I just prefer circumcised; cleanliness, visual, sexual. And I also see alot of questions in this segment from young men having problems with their foreskin and smegma etc. And seeing I m 8 months pregnant with a baby boy, and have decided to circumcise him when he is born to avoid any health issues (some issues run in my family). Also, my decision has been influenced by some recent studies in Kenya, as well as some studies by the army. Apparently a circumcised male is 60% less likely to contract HIV, and 39% less likely to contract HPV. It s to do with the skin cells that make up the inside of the foreskin, the diseases find it easy to penetrate into the body through these cells. It s a touchy subject between men, but this is my preference and decision. EDIT: Jill, if you want to spout off acting frankly very nasty, may I remind you he asked for our OPINION. You have yours, I have mine, as I clearly pointed out. Forgive me for not having read every study done on circumcision, but for quoting the ones I had read. I m open-minded, but have my own views and opinions and don t need people like you trying to drag me down and make me look stupid. Might I suggest, don t be so self-absorbed and rude when you answer questions, I really didn t need such a condescending response from anyone, I hope you re pleased.
OMG! are you serious? we don`t give a fuc*k if its circumcised or not , of course everyone is different but i find it more disgusting when its circumcised. i like it natural. there is no difference but the skin, it feels the same during s*x and its as clean as circumcised if you use water and soap at least one or two times a day. i think circumcision has no use and no point....
uncircumsized, honestly really didnt make a different for me. ive been with circumsized and uncircumsized and really it didnt matter. besides its not about how it looks, its about how you use it.
i dated a guy for 3 years that wasnt and honestly i didnt mind it. i dont know what the bad thing is about it. just as long as they keep it clean it doesnt matter. i actually liked it to, because it made it feel bigger around and that s a plus for me!
if they are that shallow then are they worth it, some of the eww s were probably from men, and why did they mention that in medieval times, it was very rare until the victorian era
it s the guy himself that should be appealing, not his penis. saying that i think most girls prefer the circumcised penis. it s cleaner and looks so much better. ?
i asked my sister she said quot; i don t care...quot; and i also asked my friend and she said she didn t care either how stupid and immature do you have to be to say EW to a penis? those people are just dumb
You question does not indicate answers needed from women only at the beginning - but your last sentence does. I am male amp; so far, I haven t heard any displeasure from women one way or another.
My boyfriend s is uncircumsized and I love it. =)
0 comments:
Post a Comment