A normal penis has a foreskin. Circumcision is unnatural, and destroys sexual sensitivity as well as making the penis partial and incomplete. Male genital mutilation, called circumcision amputates the foreskin with its 70,000 nerve endings. It disrupts the penile blood supply permanently, causes scar tissue, exposes the glans and surrounding tissue which keratinizes them and further diminishes sensitivity. The keratinization continues throughout the victim s life, which diminishes sensitivity slowly and inexorably, and also diminishes the intensity of orgasm. How can anyone with intelligence think that a penis that s been made incomplete, scarred and mutilated by circumcision can feel or function as well as a whole, normal and natural one? Gross? Since when is it gross to be whole, and not gross to be scarred and mutilated? The foreskin is an essential part of having a complete penis and a complete sexual experience. It s not just quot;extra skin.quot; 80% of the men in the world are unmutilated, they are in the majority. In America, the medical profession has made this much more commonplace than the rest of the world, as they make money from it, and doctors are very frequently members of the religions that try to perpetrate male genital mutilation on all males. They even sell infants amputated foreskins for use in cosmetics!!!! About 10% of circumcisions require additional surgeries to attempt to repair damage from the first one. Doctors don t give full disclosure about the complications of circumcision, as they don t want to discourage anyone from having it done to their sons or themselves. Female circumcision of minors is illegal in the US, and males aren t protected from genital mutilation. This is sexist and unconstitutional. If you re interested in learning what was actually done to you, look at the site CIRCUMSTITIONS. The big deal is that men have been cheated out of the best part of the sexual experience, as a result of male genital mutilation. Sex still feels good to most men who are victims of circumcision, but they don t have any concept of how good it is actually supposed to be with a whole, natural and normal penis. I was a victim of male genital mutilation as an infant. I was given no choice in the matter. As a result of the damage inflicted on me, my loss of sensitivity was more than the usual 50-75% and it resulted in my inability to reach orgasm in normal sex. I found out about foreskin restoration, and have vastly improved my sensitivity, together with the intensity of orgasm, and I can attest that it s so incredibly much better with a foreskin! This archaic, barbaric and cruel practice is declining, and more men need to know what was done to them so they don t continue to perpetrate this on their sons. About 200,000 men are restoring their foreskins, and there are lots of support groups and sites regarding restoration now. The media doesn t cover the complications of circumcision (gee, I wonder why?) but we now have the internet, and can spread the word. Circumcision is the worst hoax ever perpetrated on the male sex. A foreskin is not a birth defect; it is a birthright.
This is what s absolutely ridiculous about America. I m an American and this is the type of crap that embarrasses me. quot;I personally think they re gross.quot; What a typical American; never failing to pad the stereotype that we are a quot;beauty basedquot; society. Outside of the United States, hardly anyone is circumcised. Hell, if you want an exact percentage, 82% of world s men are circumcised, if not more. If that s the case, only about 1/6 of the world is circumcised. Circumcising is becoming less and less here in the United States. From about 2000 until 2007, North Carolina has dropped from 77% of infants being circumcised to 58%. From 2007 until 2007, 70% of infants in Utah were being circumcised. Now, that number has dwindled down to 53%. I think your question should be, why was it a big deal to have a circumcised penis? Because it s more appealing? That s the best anyone can come up with? It s really not that hard to maintain an uncircumcised penis. I m circumcised, but honestly, for a male that is not, all he has to do is pull the foreskin back and clean for however long he feels he needs it. Not a big deal. What makes an uncircumcised penis so ugly anyways? Because there s more SKIN? it s SKIN, WHO CARES!
You were robbed of that privilege by some nasty people who couldn t keep their hands off your baby penis, so of course you will say it is gross (because you know what it is to not be cut, right?). As far as I know, being natural is not gross. So maybe if the men around you are taking pride in saying they are natural, it s a statement in itself to fight the misconceptions of the ignorant.
because it s the whole thing, there is a LOT of circumcstantial evidence that intact is better and makes sense as nature will get the reproductive organs right. think about it..... nature needs you to reproduce...... Studies from around the world on female sexual pleasure show that the areas of the world where the females are most sexually satisfied are the same areas that have very low circumcision rates...... funny coincidence huh?
who ever said circumcision is bad or harmful is just their personal opinion. or perhaps they are paid to endorse foreskin restoration,a bizniz hype. being circumcised is the best thing did to me. it appears hygienic, odorless means less maintenance, no excess urine left, and more sensitive during sexual activity. and it is a rock hard men..rock hard.
Well I m not circumcised, and I don t care that you think its gross. Why do you have an opinion on other men s penises anyway? Maybe you re just jealous because you had the most sensitive and important part of yours chopped off without your consent?
Yes it s probably because you are circumcised so you don t know what it s like to have a natural penis. I think it s better intact. But I ve never heard any guy say that. It all depends on country. And the foreskin does provide a bit more girth so there you go. Harriet
They get dirty easily and there s an increase chance of infection.
Theres nothing wrong with them. If you clean them every day, they re pefectly fine.
Yeah well i love the circumsized cock
It isn t a big deal to have an intact penis. Most American women have intact labias, do you think that s gross? Anyway the circ rate is amost 50/50. Intact penises are not quot;grossquot;, quot;dirtyquot;, or any other nonsense that is being spouted here. And as far as intact men beong quot;well endowedquot;, that isn t necesarily a universal truth, but circumcision is removal of up to half of the skin on the penis. That skin allows the penis to grow to it s full potential, and often circumcied penises do not grow to their full length due to the tight skin. It s like trying to put an adult hand into a child sized glove. I can t stop laughing at the guy below me. Endorse foreskin restoration? The business of circumcision is much more profitable tha that of restoration. Do some research.
It doesn t look as a appealing. Most women prefer it to be circumcised.
haha,shutup stupid,u cant even speak english!!
0 comments:
Post a Comment